单方仲裁选择权条款效力探析

若合同中的仲裁条款规定某一方有权提起仲裁,而没有相应赋予另外一方提起仲裁的权利,法院在判断这种仲裁条款的效力时,往往以显失公平为理由认定其无效,学界也有学者持这种主张,然而,这种理由表面肤浅,显失公平何以体现,司法实践和理论都没有深入充分的阐述。从民法的角度分析,这种条款应该是有效的。

Analysis of alternative right provision effect of unilateral arbitration

When the arbitration provision in a contract defines that a party has fight to ask arbitration but the other party does not have related right to ask arbitration,a court always determines its in-effect in order to make fair judge when the court judges the provision.Some scholars in academic circle also have the opinion. However,the reason of this provision unilaterally shows roughness and how to embody fairness is not sufficient- ly interpreted in judicial practice and theory.Analyzed from the angle of civil law,this kind of provision should be effective.