刑法典第89条第2款“又犯罪”之检讨与修改

我国刑法典第89条第2款将追诉时效中断的事由规定为“又犯罪”，对于此项立法模式，理论界有不同的认识但关注较少，虽提出了不同的建议，但并未触及问题的根本。通过“又犯罪”这一时效中断事由的剖析和检讨发现，“又犯罪”作为追诉时效中断事由，折射出理论上的误区和立法中的悖论，不可避免地遭遇实践困窘。将“又犯罪”修改为“又犯同种罪”，方为解决问题的根本出路所在。

Review and Revise the "Commit Crimes Again" of Article 89, Paragraph 2 of Criminal Code

The Article 89, paragraph 2 of China＇s Criminal Code provides that the reason of interrupting the limitation of prosecution is the ＂ Commit crimes again＂. Though there are different understandings, there is little attention to this legislative model in the theoretical circles. Scholars put forward some different proposals, but nearly all didn＇t touch the root of the problem. Through analyzing and reviewing ＂ Commit crimes again＂ which is the reason of interruption of limitation, as the reason of interruption of limitation, ＂ commit crimes again＂ reflects the misunderstanding of theory and the legislative paradox. Those problems confronted embarrassment in practice inevitably. We find that the legislation should modify ＂commit crimes again＂ to ＂commit the same kind of crimes again＂ in order to solve the problem thoroughly.