| 《围城》与《儒林外史》审美品格比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈彪.《围城》与《儒林外史》审美品格比较[J].合肥学院学报(社会科学版),2007,24(3):84-87. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈彪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安徽水利水电职业技术学院,基础部,合肥,230601 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《儒林外史》和《围城》两部讽刺小说都自觉接续了小说喜剧性的传统,同时未忘对社会人生的严肃思考,形成了悲喜剧交融的审美品格。但在构成小说喜剧性元素的丰富性方面,《围城》显然远远超过了《儒林外史》,在讽刺之外,充分运用了滑稽、幽默、机智等多种喜剧元素,增强了作品的喜剧效果。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《围城》 《儒林外史》 讽刺小说 审美品格 比较 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-920X(2007)03-0084-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年1月5日 |
Comparason of Aesthetic Features in Scholars and Fortress Besieged |
| |
| CHEN Biao.Comparason of Aesthetic Features in Scholars and Fortress Besieged[J].Journal of Hefei University:Social Sciences,2007,24(3):84-87. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Biao |
| |
| Abstract: | Scholars and Fortress Besieged are both the model of satiring fictions.This article compares the aesthetic features in the fictions.They have both formed the tragicomic aesthetic feature,but the comic factors in Fortress Besieged are more abundant than that in Scholars. |
| |
| Keywords: | Scholars Fortress Besieged satiring fictions aesthetic feature comparison |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
