接入服务提供商版权责任适当性扩张研究

新技术时代，由于技术、互联网产业形态的变化以及国际版权发展潮流的推进，传统接入服务商的“避风港”规则需要重新制定，关键问题在于增设何类版权责任以及如何对其进行制度设计。对此，理论界和实务界主要存在两种制度模式的择取争议:其一为“三振出局”制度；其二为“封网禁令”制度。就中国而言，应当增设接入服务商的“封网禁令”制度，相较于“三振出局”制度，“封网禁令”制度在技术层面和立法构建方面更具正当性和合理性，而且制度实施成本更低，维权效率更高，但在具体设计时，应结合中国的制度体系和国情进行本土化改造。

Research on the Appropriate Expansion of Access Service Provider's Copyright

In the era of new technologies, due to changes in technology and the shape of the Internet industry and the development of international copyright development, the “safe haven” rules of traditional access service providers need to be re-enacted, but the key issue is what kind of copyright liability is added and how to design the system. In this regard, there are mainly two disputes about the choice of system models in the theoretical and practical circles: one is the “three strikes ” system; the other is the “net ban” system. As far as our country is concerned, we should add the obligation of the access service provider to "block the Internet", because compared with the “three strikes out” system, the “net ban” system is more legitimate and reasonable in terms of technical level and legislative construction, and the system implementation cost is lower, and the efficiency of rights protection is higher, but in the specific design, it should be combined with China's system and national conditions for localized transformation.