风险刑法理论研究中的错位与检讨

社会风险不能等同于刑法危险，但二者存在动态交叉关系，社会风险可以通过刑事政策转变为刑法中的危险。风险刑法首先是现代刑法应对风险过程中"自觉"的结果，是现代刑法体系的同质组成部分。从贝克划分社会形态的时间考虑，我国早已进入风险社会，且是全面而非局部风险社会。我国社会主要矛盾的转变使我国社会风险在质上表现为严重危害公共安全和公共利益，在量上表现为风险的相对增多，从刑法的应对上来看，似乎只能选择刑法提前介入。风险刑法理论的中国展开应该从实然和应然两个层面出发，前者旨在突出风险刑法的教义学研究，后者需要从社会风险自身的特点出发，有针对性地调整刑法体系，以期防控风险、创造安全。

Deviation in the Theoretical Studies on Risk Criminal Law

Social risk is not equal to criminal risk, but they overlap each other in that social risk can be changed into criminal risk through criminal policy. The risk criminal law is a "conscious" result of modern criminal law's encounter with risk,and it is the homogenous component of modern criminal law system. China is now in the risk society, which is manifested in serious damage to public security and public interest, and the increase in the quantity of the shift of major social conflicts. In response to risk society,risk criminal law theory can contribute to the construction of a harmonious integration of social system and law. The theoretical studies of risk criminal law should be launched in respects of reality and the necessity, focusing on dogmatic researches on risk criminal law and on prevention of risks through criminal law respectively.