| 论刑事既判力原则的例外 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 牛振宇. 论刑事既判力原则的例外[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004, 29(1): 93-95 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 牛振宇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学,法学院,四川,成都,610065 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 作为刑事诉讼基本原则,刑事既判力原则存在已久,其基本价值在于对诉讼效益的提高和人权的保障。法理分析证明,刑事既判力原则不绝对排斥刑事再审程序的启动,但我国的刑事再审程序应从既判力原则出发进行重构。刑法的溯及力与刑事既判力存在价值上的暗合,我国刑法的溯及力应扩展到既定判决。
|
| 关 键 词： | 既判力 再审程序 溯及力 |
| 文章编号： | 1005-6378(2004)01-0093-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-10-05 |
On the Exception of Criminal Adjudged Force Principle |
| |
| NIU Zhen-yu. On the Exception of Criminal Adjudged Force Principle[J]. Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science), 2004, 29(1): 93-95 |
| |
| Authors: | NIU Zhen-yu |
| |
| Abstract: | As a basic criminal principle, adjudged force pursuits the aim of improving suit able efficiency and protecting human right. The law tenet proves that adjudged force principle dose not absolutely refuse criminal rehearing procedure, but Chinese criminal rehearing procedure should be rebuilt on the principle. There is a common value aim between retroactive effect of criminal law and criminal adjudged force, so retroactive effect of criminal law in China should extend to effective judgment. |
| |
| Keywords: | adjudged force rehearing procedure retroactive effect |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
