| 浅析法律论证 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杜文静.浅析法律论证[J].华北水利水电学院学报(社会科学版),2013(5):59-62. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杜文静 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学人文学院,上海200042 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2012年上海高校青年教师培养资助计划项目（ZZHDZF12004）;2012年华东政法大学校级项目（12HZK005）;2013年高等学校青年骨干教师国内访问学者项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | "法律论证"是通过提出某些论据或理由来证明法律决定正确性的活动,从而实现法律理性的目标。所以,首先必须了解法律论证的历史发展和研究现状,才能明确法律论证的外延范围,不然很容易引起混乱。接着分析传统法律推理的局限性,说明当今法律推理已经不再是形式逻辑在司法中的简单运用。最后提出法律论证理论,并对于认识论带来的"明希豪森困境",提出自己的解决方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法律推理 法律论证 明希豪森困境 |
The Analysis of Legal Argument |
| |
| DU Wen-jing.The Analysis of Legal Argument[J].Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power(Social Sciences Edition),2013(5):59-62. |
| |
| Authors: | DU Wen-jing |
| |
| Institution: | DU Wen-jing (Humanities school, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | In order to achieve the goal of legal rationality, legal argument is the activity to prove that law decision is the correct- ness through put forward some arguments or reasons. Thus, we must first know the research history and present situation of legal argu- ment, in order to understand the legal argument, otherwise it is easy to cause confusion. Then we analysed the limitations of the tradi- tional legal reasoning and legal reasoning at present is no longer formal logic is used in the judicial process. Finally, we put forward the theory of legal argument, and raise own solution to the theory of knowledge about the ＂ Munchhausen dilemma＂. |
| |
| Keywords: | logal reasoning logal argument munchhausen dilemma |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
