首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对中美排除非法证据若干程序的比较与评析
引用本文:王明明.对中美排除非法证据若干程序的比较与评析[J].太原师范学院学报(社会科学版),2012,11(4):40-45.
作者姓名:王明明
作者单位:中国人民公安大学,北京,100038
摘    要:非法证据排除规则发源于美国法制,我国非法证据排除规则之立法亦深受美国法制的影响。从比较法视角,对中美两国有关排除非法证据的适用阶段、启动程序、证明责任与证明标准以及救济程序等程序性内容进行对比与评析,以期对我国非法证据排除程序的相关内容进行解读和反思,并探求我国语境下应然的非法证据排除规则,进而谋求对其改进与完善之道。

关 键 词:非法证据排除  适用阶段  启动程序  证明责任与证明标准  救济程序

Comparative Analysis on Several Procedural Provisions of Exclusionary Rule on Illegal Evidence of China and the United States
WANG Ming-ming.Comparative Analysis on Several Procedural Provisions of Exclusionary Rule on Illegal Evidence of China and the United States[J].Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition,2012,11(4):40-45.
Authors:WANG Ming-ming
Institution:WANG Ming-ming(Chinese People’s Public Security University,Beijing 100038,China)
Abstract:The legislation of China's Exclusionary Rule on Illegal Evidence has been profoundly influenced by the U.S.legal system.From the viewpoint of comparison,the comparative analysis on applicable phases,initiating procedures,evidencing liabilities and standards,and relief procedures of U.S.and Chinese exclusionary rule on illegal evidence respectively is expected to understand and review relevant content in Chinese ones,and to explore the optimized ways for it for its perfection.
Keywords:Exclusionary Rule on Illegal Evidence  applicable and standards  relief procedures phases  initiating procedures  evidencing liabilities
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号