| SPECIAL ISSUE： FOCUSING ON THE REVISION OF CHINA＇S CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW IN 2012 Research on the Legal Attributes and Values of Forensic Testimony in Criminal Proceedings from the Perspective of Legal Norms |
| |
| 引用本文： | 练育强,Liu Hui.SPECIAL ISSUE： FOCUSING ON THE REVISION OF CHINA＇S CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW IN 2012 Research on the Legal Attributes and Values of Forensic Testimony in Criminal Proceedings from the Perspective of Legal Norms[J].Social Sciences in China,2012(4):157-167. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 练育强 Liu Hui |
| |
| 作者单位： | East China University of Political Science and Law |
| |
| 基金项目： | the Youth Project of the National Social Sciences Foundation“Linking Securies Administrative Punishment with Criminal Penalty”(No.11CFX048);support from the Project of the Institute of Foreign Law and Comparetive Law of East China University of Political Science and Law(No.SJ0709);the Disciplinary Building Project of Legal History of East China University of Political Science and Law(No.030102) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 就法律规范层面而言，鉴定在刑事诉讼过程中的法律属性体现为两个方面：一是证据的收集方式，一是权力的行使方式。鉴定的这两种法律属性的价值追求是不同的，作为证据收集方式的价值追求是“公正”，而作为权力行使方式的价值追求是“效率”。从涉及刑事诉讼鉴定不同阶段的法律规范分析来看，鉴定正逐步从权力行使属性为主导向证据收集属性为主导过渡，但要真正实现其证据收集这一本质属性的回归，其前提是《刑事诉讼法》的价值追求的变化，即从“效率”到“公正”的转变。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法规范 刑事诉讼鉴定 法律属性 价值追求 |
Research on the Legal Attributes and Values of Forensic Testimony in Criminal Proceedings from the Perspective of Legal Norms |
| |
| Social Sciences in China.Research on the Legal Attributes and Values of Forensic Testimony in Criminal Proceedings from the Perspective of Legal Norms[J].中国社会科学(英文版),2012(4):157-167. |
| |
| Authors: | Social Sciences in China |
| |
| Institution: | Lian Yuqiang East China University of Political Science and Law Liu Hui |
| |
| Abstract: | From the perspective of legal norms, the legal attributes of forensic testimony in the course of criminal proceedings are manifested in two forms： one is the collection of evidence; the other is the exercise of power. However, the values residing in these two legal attributes are not the same. The former emphasizes ＂justice,＂ and the latter, ＂efficiency.＂ An analysis of the legal norms governing forensic testimony in different periods shows that forensic testimony in criminal proceedings is gradually shifting from a pattern dominated by the exercise of power to one characterized by the collection of evidence. However, a genuine return to the essential character of forensic testimony as the collection of evidence must be premised on a change in the value orientation of the Criminal Procedure Law, that is, on a change from ＂efficiency＂ to ＂justice.＂ |
| |
| Keywords: | legal norms forensic testimony legal attributes value orientation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
