| 四部分类是图书分类而非学术分类 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄晏妤. 四部分类是图书分类而非学术分类[J]. 四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2000, 0(2): 104-112 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄晏妤 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学图书馆馆员,四川,成都,610064 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 经、史、子、集四部本是中国古代图书文献的分类,但现在常将其视为中国传统学术的分类.赞成和反对这一看法的多为研究学术史的学者,本文从图书分类学的视角考察这一问题,注重图书分类与学术分类的异同,论证四部分类是图书分类而非学术分类,并简单分析图书分类被一些学者看作学术分类的原因.
|
| 关 键 词： | 图书分类 学术分类 四部 目录学 校雠学 郑樵 章学诚 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-0766(2000)02-0104-09 |
| 修稿时间： | 1999-08-04 |
Classification of Books or Classification of Scholarship: A Study on the Four-division Classification in Pre-modern China |
| |
| HUANG Yan-yu. Classification of Books or Classification of Scholarship: A Study on the Four-division Classification in Pre-modern China[J]. Journal of Sichuan University(Social Science Edition), 2000, 0(2): 104-112 |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Yan-yu |
| |
| Abstract: | The four-division classification of Classics, Histories, Scuds of Ideas, and Collections of Works is originally the classification of books in pre-modern China; yet it is often regarded as classification of scholarship by some scholars. This paper investigates it from the perspective of library science, exploring similarities and distinctions between classifications of books and scholarship, proving that the four-division classification is indeed the classification of forks, and analyzing why it has been perceived as classification of scholarship. |
| |
| Keywords: | classification of books classification of scholarship the four-division classification bibliogra- phy Zheng Qiao Zhang Xue-cheng |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
