综合法学理论评述

作为当代的法律哲学的三个主流学派,自然法学、分析实证主义法学和法社会学三大法学派在法律是什么这个问题上,分别提出各自的主张,法律是价值？是形式？还是事实？三大主流学派各主张法律研究的某一方面,进而围绕法的一系列问题展开论战。由于三大法学派的片面性和排他性,法学家们呼吁各流派相互融合、补充,以此来形成一个新的法学理论体系,综合法学理论便应运而生。但综合法学理论还有其自身的局限性,本文将从法律概念、法律规则的角度来评述综合法学理论产生的必然性及其理论的局限性。

A Comment on Comprehensive Legal Theory

As the three main streams in modern legal philosophy,natural law,analytical positivist jurisprudence and legal sociology have put forward some proposals on what is law.Is law a kind of value？ A format？ Or a truth？ The three main streams had a debate on a series of questions relating to law,and they asserted some area of law study.Owing to one-sidedness and exclusiveness of the three streams,jurists call on mergence and supplements between streams so as to form a new legal theory system.The comprehensive legal theory emerges as the time requires.However,it still has its own limitations.This paper makes a comment on how the legal theory was born,the necessity and its theoretical limitation.