首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论中国历史学研究的两种传统
引用本文:蒋广学. 论中国历史学研究的两种传统[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学.人文科学.社会科学 ), 2002, 39(3)
作者姓名:蒋广学
作者单位:南京大学,中国思想家研究中心,南京,210093
摘    要:中国历史学自古以来就存在着重考据和重义理两种治学传统。这两种传统之间并无高下优劣之分,高下优劣只存在于各自传统的内部。由于受“重实践”治学精神的影响,中国史学的主流是考据派,而此派在20世纪受到西方科学思潮的影响而获得了理性的形式后,更有独霸史坛之势。在“科学理性”日益向考据派渗透的今天,义理派应该大胆地向“审美的”领域拓展。

关 键 词:史学  义理派  考据派

On the Two Traditions of Chinese Historical Studies
JIANG Guang-xue. On the Two Traditions of Chinese Historical Studies[J]. Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), 2002, 39(3)
Authors:JIANG Guang-xue
Abstract:There have existed two scholastic traditions since ancient times in Chinese historical studies: textual criticism and argumentation. It cannot be said that one is superior to the other. Their superiority or inferiority exists only within their own traditions. Influenced by the practice-oriented academic spirit, the textual criticism school has been the mainstream in Chinese historical studies. Assuming the form of rationality with the influence of western scientific thinking in the 20th century, the school now has a tendency to predominate the historical community. Today, when scientific rationality" is penetrating the textual criticism school, the argumentation school should expand bravely to "aesthetic territories.
Keywords:historical studies  argumentation school  textual criticism school  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号