| 中韩仲裁立法的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 马炎秋.中韩仲裁立法的比较研究[J].大连海事大学学报(社会科学版),2004,3(1):39-43. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 马炎秋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国海洋大学,法学院,山东,青岛,266071 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20 0 2年修订的韩国《仲裁法》强调国际化和自由化 ,大量参考和运用了外国先进立法和国际公约的规定 ,在当事人意思自治、仲裁庭的自裁管辖权、仲裁协议的“书面”形式的解释、仲裁中的财产保全制度及申请撤销仲裁裁决制度方面与中国《仲裁法》有很大的不同 ,其中的某些制度很值得我国仲裁立法借鉴。
|
| 关 键 词： | 仲裁 仲裁程序 仲裁协议 仲裁裁决 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-7031(2004)01-0039-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年12月8日 |
Comparative study on arbitration law of China and Korea |
| |
| Ma Yanqiu.Comparative study on arbitration law of China and Korea[J].Journal of Dalian Maritime University:Social Science Edition,2004,3(1):39-43. |
| |
| Authors: | Ma Yanqiu |
| |
| Abstract: | The Arbitration Law of Korea revised in 2002 laid special stress on its international standardization and the freedom of the parties in arbitration. The law has many differences from the Arbitration Law of China regarding autonomy of will of the parties, self-determination jurisdiction of the arbitration tribunal, interpretation of the word "written form", attachment in arbitration and cancellation of an arbitral award. Some of its regulations are worth using for reference in our arbitration legislation. |
| |
| Keywords: | arbitration arbitral procedure arbitral agreement arbitral award |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
