After the Interview |
| |
Authors: | Warren Carol A B Barnes-Brus Tori Burgess Heather Wiebold-Lippisch Lori Hackney Jennifer Harkness Geoffrey Kennedy Vickie Dingwall Robert Rosenblatt Paul C Ryen Ann Shuy Roger |
| |
Institution: | (1) Department of Sociology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045 |
| |
Abstract: | This article is concerned with after the interview, a strip of time (Goffman 1974, p. 10) between the end of the formal interview and the culmination of leave-taking rituals. Although there is a considerable and growing literature on qualitative interviewing (Arksey and Knight 1999; Kvale 1996; Rubin and Rubin 1995; Weiss 1994), and some corridor talk about the meaning of off the record post-interview comments, this topic has received little attention in the published literature (but see DeSantis 1980 and Wenger 2001). And we think it is an important one, since it illuminates the interviewee's interpretation of the interviewer and interview process, and highlights aspects of the meaning of the topic, and of the interviewer, to the respondent (which is, after all, the endpoint of the qualitative interviewing method). Further, the question of what constitutes after the interview throws into relief the question of what is an interview. |
| |
Keywords: | interview frame analysis forms of talk gender |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|