首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

马克思主义是社会历史的整体视界——英国新马克思主义的“事实”与“理论”之争及其启示
引用本文:乔瑞金,师文兵.马克思主义是社会历史的整体视界——英国新马克思主义的“事实”与“理论”之争及其启示[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,28(4):1-6.
作者姓名:乔瑞金  师文兵
作者单位:山西大学,哲学社会学学院,山西,太原,030006
摘    要:文章较为深入地分析了英国新马克思主义的代表人物爱德华·帕尔默·汤普森(EdwardPalmerThomp son)和佩里·安德森(PerryAnderson)两人关于"事实"与"理论"的激烈争论,对他们在理解上各自存在的问题进行了讨论,并指出了双方争论的实质以及消除这一争论的途径。文章认为,"事实"与"理论"之争其实是特殊与普遍、具体与抽象之争,是一个事物的两个方面的对立,这种对立只能在以实践为基础的马克思主义的整体视界中获得统一。

关 键 词:汤普森  安德森  事实  理论  分析
文章编号:1000-5935(2005)04-0001-06
修稿时间:2005年4月18日

Marxism is the Holistic Visual Field of Social History--Dispute over "Fact" and "Theory" within English New Marxism and Its revelation
QIAO Rui-jin,SHI Wen-bing.Marxism is the Holistic Visual Field of Social History--Dispute over "Fact" and "Theory" within English New Marxism and Its revelation[J].Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2005,28(4):1-6.
Authors:QIAO Rui-jin  SHI Wen-bing
Abstract:In this article, the author analyzes the debate on "fact" and "theory" between Thompson and Anderson, who are the members of English New Marxism, and discusses their mistakes in understanding the issue. What's more, the author shows the essence of the debate and presents an approach to avoid the debate. The author holds the view that the debate on "fact" and "theory" actually is a debate on the particular and the general, the concrete and the abstract, that it is the contradiction between two sides in a thing, and that the contradiction can't be unified unless it is placed in holistic visual field of Marxism which is based on practice.
Keywords:Thompson  Anderson  fact  theory  analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号