首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

鲁迅、周作人的文学史论异同——《中国小说的历史的变迁》和《中国新文学的源流》比较
引用本文:刘恋. 鲁迅、周作人的文学史论异同——《中国小说的历史的变迁》和《中国新文学的源流》比较[J]. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014, 0(3): 87-92
作者姓名:刘恋
作者单位:扬州大学广陵学院,江苏扬州225002
基金项目:江苏省社会科学基金项目(12ZWB011)
摘    要:鲁迅的《中国小说的历史的变迁》,以史涵论,蕴含着"人"(真人)的评史标准;周作人的《中国新文学的源流》,以论带史,返观"五四"新文化运动,明确了"志"(感情)的评史标准。这两篇讲稿,虽各有治学路数,但都着眼于新文学的"当下"文坛,从不同方向推进"人"的文学史观。

关 键 词:鲁迅  周作人  文学史  进化论  循环观  史与论

A Comparative Study of the Opinions of Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren towards Literary History
LIU Lian. A Comparative Study of the Opinions of Lu Xun and Zhou Zuoren towards Literary History[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2014, 0(3): 87-92
Authors:LIU Lian
Affiliation:LIU Lian (School of Chinese Language and Literature, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, Jiangsu, China)
Abstract:Lu Xun's Vicissitudes of Chinese Novels contains his comments in literary history descrip- tion and embodies the standard of "human being" (real human being) in his commenting; Zhou Zuoren's Headstream of Chinese New Literature explicates his comments displaying at once the liter- ary history, reviews the "May Fourth New Culture Movement" and makes dear the standard of "Zhi" (sentiment) in commenting history. The two [ectures, though in different academic approaches, both focus on the literary arena of the new literature and advance the humanistic concept of literay history from different directions.
Keywords:Lu Xun  Zhou Zuoren  literary history  theory of evolution  circulation view  history andcomment
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号