语言哲学的文本解释与结构解释——从虚拟语态看中西方哲学思维取向

和西方哲学相比 ,中国哲学很少讨论彼岸世界和来世问题。这种取向差异可以通过语言范畴化程度的分析得到进一步证实。语言文本中隐藏的观念和语言结构或语言范畴中隐藏的观念具有不同的性质。语言范畴集中反映了一个民族的深层思维取向。汉语缺少虚拟语法范畴反映了汉民族不太关心超事实和真实事实的对立 ,而不是没有区分这两种对立项的能力。可以说中国哲学的主体者汉民族有一种泛实思维取向 ,而西方哲学的主体者印欧民族有一种关心超事实和真实事实对立的超实思维取向。这种差异在宗教、逻辑学、数学和科学活动中也有体现。

On the Difference between Chinese and Western Thinking Aims from Subjunctive Mood Chinese

Compared with Western Philosophy, the Chinese Philosophy seldom talks about the other world. This difference can be further proved in language categories. What exits in language text is different from what exists in language structure or language categories. Language categories reflect the styles of deep thinking. The lacking of subjunctive in Chinese language reflects the indifference between facts and ultra facts in Chinese minds. There is a pan-fact attention in Chinese culture, while an ultra fact attention in Western culture. This difference also embodies in the actives of religion, logic, mathematics and science.