| “四书之《大学》《中庸》，非《礼记》之《大学》《中庸》”考释 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 曾军.“四书之《大学》《中庸》，非《礼记》之《大学》《中庸》”考释[J].重庆邮电学院学报(社会科学版),2008,20(3):92-97. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曾军 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中师范大学文学院 湖北武汉430079 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 四库馆臣提出“四书之《大学》、《中庸》”和“《礼记》之《大学》、《中庸》”两个概念，反映了《大学》、《中庸》与《礼记》的分合作为汉唐——宋明——清三阶段学术转轨标志的事实。经考释可知，“《礼记》之《大学》、《中庸》”属经学范畴，“四书之《大学》、《中庸》”属理学范畴，分属不同的思想体系，有其各自的渊源。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《大学》 《中庸》 四书 《礼记》 |
| 文章编号： | 1673-8268(2008)03-0092-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年12月27 |
The Textual Research on The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean of "The Four books" but not of The Book of Rites |
| |
| ZENG Jun.The Textual Research on The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean of "The Four books" but not of The Book of Rites[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition),2008,20(3):92-97. |
| |
| Authors: | ZENG Jun |
| |
| Institution: | ZENG Jun(College of Chinese Language and Literature, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Four storehouse feudal official proposes two concepts,one is The Great Learningand The Doctrine of the Meanof "The Four books",the other is The Great Learningand The Doctrine of the Meanof The Book of Rites.It symbolized as the academic change from the Han and Tang to the Song and Ming and then to the Qing.From the textual research and explication we can know that The Great Learningand The Doctrine of the Meanof The Book of Ritesbelongs to Confucian classics,and The Great Learningand The Doctrine of the Meanof "The Four books" belongs to the neo-Confucianism.They belong to different ideological system and have their respective origin. |
| |
| Keywords: | The Great Learning The Doctrine of the Mean "The Four Books" The Book of Rites |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
