论充足理由律在法律推理中的作用

在审判过程中,法官的法律推理活动总的表现为以法律规范为大前提,以确认的案件事实为小前提, 前通过二者的联结进而得出结论的演绎论证模式。该模式表明的只是审判活动的总体思维结构,其 中,特别是对案件事实的确认,即小前提的建立,和在此基础上“寻找”或援用可适用于此案件事实的 法律依据,即大前提的建立,都包含了比较复杂的思维活动,涉及到许多逻辑问题。其中逻辑思维规 律中的充足理由律在法律推理过程中的作用尤为突出。

Role of the Rule of Ample Reasons in Legal Reasoning

In the process of a judge' s trial, the legal reasoning is a major premise of law modes, a minor premise of case fact identification and a deduction proof model based on the major and minor premises. In the course, the identification of case fact, namely the establishment of minor premise, and the "search"or citing of legal evidence appropriate to the case, namely the establishment of the major premise, involve relatively complex activities of thinking and a number of logical issues. In particular, the rule of ample reasons in logical thoughts plays an important role in legal reasoning.