首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中越两国检察机关法律监督职能比较研究
引用本文:许能凤. 中越两国检察机关法律监督职能比较研究[J]. 学术探索, 2006, 0(2): 58-62
作者姓名:许能凤
作者单位:云南大学,法学院,云南,昆明,650091
摘    要:权力不受制约必然导致滥用和专断,侦查权、审判权也是如此。检察机关与生俱有的监督性决定了检察机关成为国家的法律监督机关,有权对各种诉讼活动实施法律监督。中越两国检察机关都是国家专门的法律监督机关,履行法律监督职能,可在具体监督的权限和范围上,却有很大的差别。鉴于我国目前的司法现状,有必要借鉴越南的法律监督措施,进一步完善我国的法律监督制度,以规制权力,保障人权,维护司法公正,维护社会和公共利益。

关 键 词:检察  法律监督  立案监督  侦查监督  审判监督
文章编号:1006-723X(2006)02-0058-05
修稿时间:2006-01-16

A Comparison Study of the Supervision Responsibilities of the Procuratiorial Organ Between China and Vietnam
XU Neng-feng. A Comparison Study of the Supervision Responsibilities of the Procuratiorial Organ Between China and Vietnam[J]. Academic Research, 2006, 0(2): 58-62
Authors:XU Neng-feng
Abstract:Power will lead to abusing and acting inevitably if it isn't restricted.That's also the case for the detection authority,the trial authority.The procuratorial organ has native supervision,so it is the national legal supervision organ.It supervises all kinds of lawsuit activity.The procuratorial organs of China and Vietnam are all the national special legal supervision organ.They fulfill the legal supervision funtion,but it is actually far from in the naterial rights and scope.In order to control power to ensure human rights,to vindicate the judicial impartialty,and to maintain the social and public profits,we should borrow the legal supervision measure of Vietnam.What we do can make the legal supervision system more perfect.
Keywords:legal supervision  register supervision  detection supervision  trial supervision
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号