| 经典测量理论中的信度理论与信度系数——与张敏强教授商榷 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 席仲恩,汪顺玉.经典测量理论中的信度理论与信度系数——与张敏强教授商榷[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2007,13(6):116-120. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 席仲恩 汪顺玉 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 重庆邮电大学,外国语学院,重庆,400065;重庆邮电大学,外国语学院,重庆,400065 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 文章指出了《教育测量学》一书关于信度理论和信度系数值得商榷之处:系数的定义表述不严谨,未区分信度系数的定义式和估计式,对信度系数定义的评注不符合科学现状,定理的证明含有错误,证明的条件不全,符号使用混乱;建议在入门教材中删除有关信度系数的证明过程.
|
| 关 键 词： | 经典测量理论 信度 信度理论 信度系数 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-5831(2007)06-0116-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007年9月22日 |
Reliability Theory and Reliability Coefficient in Classical Test Theory: A Discussion with Prof. Zhang Minqiang |
| |
| XI Zhong-en,WANG Shun-yu.Reliability Theory and Reliability Coefficient in Classical Test Theory: A Discussion with Prof. Zhang Minqiang[J].Journal of Chongqing University(Social Sciences Edition),2007,13(6):116-120. |
| |
| Authors: | XI Zhong-en WANG Shun-yu |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper elaborates on the doubtful points with regard to reliability theory and reliability coefficient in the textbook Educational Measurement.These points include loose definition of reliability,unjust remarks on the definition,erroneous proof of theorems and inadequacy of necessary conditions for the proof,inconsistency in notation and the use of symbols.It suggests that in textbooks at the introductory level,mathematical proofs of theorems concerning the estimation of reliability coefficient be cut out. |
| |
| Keywords: | classical test theory reliability reliability theory reliability coefficient |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
