首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


“TRUTH” AND “RECONCILIATION” AS SOCIAL INDICATORS
Authors:James L.?Gibson
Affiliation:(1) Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, 219 Eliot Hall, Campus Box 1063, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899, USA;(2) Fellow, Centre for Comparative and International Politics, Stellenbosch University, Matieland, South Africa
Abstract:Countries throughout the world are trying to move toward a more democratic future through truth and reconciliation processes, under the assumption that truth causes reconciliation and that reconciliation contributes to democratization. But are “truth” and “reconciliation” concepts that can be measured rigorously and reliability? I present evidence in this article that each can be measured as an attribute of individuals, based on a large survey conducted in South Africa. My findings indicate that truth does indeed contribute to reconciliation. But because reconciliation is quite capable of changing (and likely to change) over time, efforts must be made to track levels of reconciliation as an important social indicator. Many countries in transition would profit greatly from implementing a Reconciliation Barometer to measure movement toward or away from the consolidation of democratic reform.
Keywords:truth commissions  transitional justice  tolerance  South African politics
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号