首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

科技元伦理学视域下的科技责任探析
引用本文:庞西院.科技元伦理学视域下的科技责任探析[J].理论界,2014(3):108-110.
作者姓名:庞西院
作者单位:上海大学社会科学学院,上海200444
基金项目:本文系教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“身体:理解技术与伦理的独特视域”(项目号:lIYJA720044)的研究成果.
摘    要:科学技术的快速发展,既为人类带来了科技的"善",也不可避免地出现了科技的"恶"。风险社会背景下,科技主体不同趋向的选择无疑会使社会的发展产生巨大的差异。在规避科技的"恶"时,传统科技伦理学因其道德词汇的模糊性和不确定性,使道德判断陷入了歧义;科技元伦理学则以其概念的明晰性和逻辑的严密性彰显出了鲜明的特点。通过对"责任主体是谁"、"在何种程度上负责"以及"责任对象是谁"等问题展开元伦理学层次的语言分析,我们会发现,科技元伦理学并非为科技责任提供了坚实的道德信念基础,而是凸显着复杂性、语境性和开放性等特征。

关 键 词:元伦理学  科学技术  责任  语言分析

On the Responsibility of Science and Technology From the Perspective of Meta-ethics of Science and Technology
Pang Xiyuan.On the Responsibility of Science and Technology From the Perspective of Meta-ethics of Science and Technology[J].Theory Horizon,2014(3):108-110.
Authors:Pang Xiyuan
Institution:Pang Xiyuan (Shool of Social Science, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)
Abstract:The rapid development of science and technology has not only brought the goodness of science and technology, but also inevitably brought the evilness of science and technology. Meanwhile, Meta-ethics of Science and Technology shows its distinctive features because of its conceptual clarity and logic strictness. Based on it, we take a meta-ethics languages analysis on such questions as who should bear responsibility. Meta-ethics of science and technology does not provide any solid foundation of moral belief to the responsibility of science and technology, but shows its complexity, contextuality and openness.
Keywords:meta-ethics  science and technology  responsibility  language analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号