古典文学没有“思想”？ ——与张宝明先生商榷

张宝明先生的大作《人文学：文学史与思想史关系的再诠释》提出以“人文学”来整合文学史与思想史之关系，问题意识与探索精神难能可贵。但张文观点偏颇，逻辑混乱，论述古典文学的部分尤其突出。其要者有如下数端：一、挦扯学术概念。如其对“人文”、“思想”等概念之阐释，能为其所用者存，所不能用者弃；二、立论准的无依，莫衷一是。如以文学史、思想史之联系来肯定现代文学，以二者之贯通来否定古典文学；三、罔顾史实，师心遣论。如其以“五四”为标准的所谓现代性思想来通盘否定古典文学的思想性，既不符合古典文学实际，也不符合“五四”知识分子对古典文学的态度；四、自相矛盾，捉襟见肘。如其从普遍人性的角度来关合文学史与思想史，认为二者有“普遍”和“天然”的联系；既为“普遍”、“天然”，何以古典文学又被排除在外？疵累种种，实难尽说，故草成此文，以就教于张先生。

No "Ideological Level" in Classic Literature?——A Discussion with Mr. Zhang Bao-Ming

In his book titled Humanities:a Re-Interpretation of the Relation between the History of Literature and the History of Thoughts,Mr. Zhang Bao-ming puts forward an argument of the relation between the history of literature and the history of thoughts integrated with humanities,which embodies a valuable exploration and innovation. But,at the same time,some of his viewpoints seem too radical and illogical,especially about classic literature. They are as follows:(1) Confusing academic concepts,for example,about...