首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

法律推理客观性的法理探析
引用本文:李丽,于敬. 法律推理客观性的法理探析[J]. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2010, 55(3): 128-131
作者姓名:李丽  于敬
作者单位:山东政法学院,新闻传播系,山东,济南,250014
基金项目:山东政法学院科研规划课题 
摘    要:法律推理作为一种规范法律人思维的的技术性工具,其客观性是法治理念在司法操作层面的具体体现。科学地阐释法律推理的客观性内涵,对于完善法律推理理论研究,规范法官的职业思维方式具有重要意义。司法实践中,法律推理客观性的研究应当从纯粹的逻辑分析拓展至价值领域,正确处理两者之间的关系对其客观性的实现起着至关重要的作用。法律推理客观性实现的最理想状态是,形式规则与自由裁量呈现适当高度的动态平衡,两者之间的冲突最少而正面价值最大。

关 键 词:法律推理  客观性  法治  法理分析

Jurisprudence Analysis of the Objectivity of Legal Reasoning
Li Li,Yu Jing. Jurisprudence Analysis of the Objectivity of Legal Reasoning[J]. Journal of Shandong Teachers' University(Social Science Edition), 2010, 55(3): 128-131
Authors:Li Li  Yu Jing
Affiliation:(Department of Journalism and Communication,Shandong Institute of Political Science and Law,Jinan,Shandong,250014)
Abstract:Legal reasoning often acts as a technical tool for regulating lawyers' thought,and the objectivity of it usually reflects the rule of law concept at judicial operational level.Scientific interpretation of the connotation of legal reasoning objectivity is very significant in promoting the theoretical study of legal reasoning and specifying judges' professional way of thinking.In judicial practice,the study of the objectivity of legal reasoning ought to be extended from pure logical analysis to the field of value,and proper handling of their relationship plays a vital role in the realization of the objectivity.The ideal realization of the objectivity of legal reasoning is supposed to be like this: formal rules and discretionary?hold a dynamic balance in appropriate height,and they have the least conflicts and the most positive values.
Keywords:Legal reasoning  Objectivity  Rule of law  Jurisprudence analysis
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号