骆宾王'对策文'相关问题考辨————-兼补《登科记考》

骆宾王《对策文三道》可称'完璧'，但有关研究还很不够，诸多问题有待考实。骆宾王和王勃虽都曾上书求荐且后者'对策高第'，但并不能由此直接断定骆宾王也同科对策及第。骆宾王试策文本在形式和内容上有诸多与制举试策体制不符及不合'时宜'、不'得体'处，其策问及对策与骆宾王的其他作品有很高的一致性。结合相关文献材料，大抵可推知骆宾王可能既未参加乾封元年的制举考试，亦未参加其他科目的考试，故亦无及第之实。他未参加的原因主要在于未获举荐，未获举荐的原因则与其以前在道王府的任职'背景'有关，其试策文可能是模拟或投献之作。《登科记考》的阙载或有鉴于此，或系偶尔疏失。

A Study of Some Related Issues on Luo Binwang's Duice Texts:Additional Comments on Dengkeji Kao

The Duicewen Sandao by Luo Binwang in the Tang Dynasty can be said to be a perfect piece of work. However, related issues on this work still remain and are in need of further research.Both Luo Binwang and Wang Bo submitted their written statements to the local governers, and Wang succeeded in occupying a prominent position in office. However, we cannot infer from this event that Luo also succeeded in his effort to obtain his position. The Shice Texts by Luo are different from Zhiju Shice in both contents and form, but Luo's Cewen and Duice Texts are identical with his other articles. With a comparative study of related documents, we may conclude that Luo did not take part in the test of Zhiju and the other tests, and therefore he did not obtain the high position in office. The main reason for his failure to take part in the test is that he was not recommended. That may be the result of his work background at Dao Wang's House, and his article in the Shice Texts may be a piece of imitation work or an offer to the imperial court. All these may account for the fact that there is no record in Dengkeji Kao or there may exist some careless mistakes in the works concerned.