首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

法律推理的概念辨正
引用本文:张民全.法律推理的概念辨正[J].南华大学学报(社会科学版),2016,17(5):84-91.
作者姓名:张民全
作者单位:中国政法大学 2011计划司法文明协同创新中心,北京 100088
摘    要:既有的三类法律推理概念失之过狭,这是由于它们对法律推理本质的认识不够准确。法律推理本质上是一种思维活动,而非权威性的制度实践;它包含法律事实的发现和认定、法律规范的获取和证立以及根据法律事实和法律规范对法律结论的推导等内容。故而,法律推理是人们在解决法律问题时,根据证据等信息并在与法律规范的调适中发现和认定法律事实、获取并论证法律规范,并在此基础上推导和论证法律结论的一种思维活动。

关 键 词:法律推理  制度实践  法律事实  法律规范
收稿时间:2016/7/15 0:00:00

The Concept of Legal Reasoning
ZHANG Min-quan.The Concept of Legal Reasoning[J].Journal of Nanhua University(Social Science Edition),2016,17(5):84-91.
Authors:ZHANG Min-quan
Institution:China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088,China
Abstract:The concepts of legal reasoning can be roughly divided into three categories, which are all too narrow, because they all misunderstand the nature of legal reasoning. Legal reasoning is a kind of thinking activity on its nature, rather than an authoritative institutional practice. It includes the discovery and identification of legal facts, the acquisition and justification of legal norms, and the inference of the legal conclusions according to the legal facts and legal norms. According to this, legal reasoning can be defined as a kind of thinking activity, in which people solve a legal problem, discover and identify the legal facts by using the information such as evidence and adjusting to the legal norms, acquest and justify the legal norms, and infer the legal conclusions according to the legal facts and legal norms.
Keywords:legal reasoning  institutional practice  legal norms  legal facts
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号