首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论我国法院调解制度的完善
引用本文:尹力,戴恩潮. 论我国法院调解制度的完善[J]. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 2007, 20(4): 101-107
作者姓名:尹力  戴恩潮
作者单位:宁波大学,法学院,浙江,宁波,315211;华东政法学院,国际法系,上海,200042
摘    要:我国法院调解制度存在的弊端主要包括:调审合一的制度设计使法官角色定位出现偏差,从而使调解容易违反当事人的意愿而丧失调解的特质;法院调解制度中的一些原则设置不尽合理;调解书这一法律文书的效力没有得到应有的强化等。对此,可以采取如下对策予以解决:实行调审分离的模式;废除调解制度中的查明事实、分清是非原则,增加保密原则,明确合法原则的内容;以及赋予调解书应有的法律效力,使其摆脱效力的不确定性等。

关 键 词:法院调解  调审分离  调解书
文章编号:1001-5124(2007)04-0101-07
修稿时间:2007-02-15

On the Improvement of the Litigation Intermediation System in China
YIN Li,DAI En-chao. On the Improvement of the Litigation Intermediation System in China[J]. Journal of Ningbo University(Liberal Arts Edition), 2007, 20(4): 101-107
Authors:YIN Li  DAI En-chao
Abstract:There exist some demerits of the litigation intermediation system of China,which are: 1) the roles of the judge are deviant,resulting from both mediation and litigation,which easily leads to the violation of voluntary principle of the parties involved;some principles of mediation system are irrational;the legal effect of mediation agreements were not duly enhanced.Therefore,it is proposed in the paper that the following countermeasures could be imposed: separating mediation from litigation,abrogating the principles of ascertaining the facts and drawing a clear distinction between the right and wrong,adding the principle of confidentiality,making the contents of legality explicit;and endowing proper legal effect of mediation agreement.
Keywords:litigation intermediation  distinguishing mediation from litigation  mediation agreement
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号