一般均衡理论逻辑分析体系的哲学批判

一般均衡理论作为描述经济现象、概括经济问题的理论工具具有了思想体系严谨和逻辑形式优美的特质。但是由于均衡理论的逻辑立论是以市场出清为前提的,客观上存在着实验观察和逻辑批判的双重否定。然而该理论关于均衡价格导致市场出清推理过程,不论在理论上还是在方法论上却是有意义的。一般均衡理论是人们试图建立公理化逻辑体系的出发点,用均衡理论分析现实经济问题,只要有一个制度框架强附加条件的配合,便能增强理论的阐释力。非瓦尔拉斯均衡理论在对一般均衡逻辑分析体系的哲学批判中,试图保持原有逻辑分析体系的一致性,通过引入配额协调机制这一制度因素,构建一个能描述市场非出清状态下的动态一般逻辑分析拓展模型,使对一般均衡理论发展达到了新的理论境界,成为研究经济问题的方法论基础。

Philosophical Criticism on Logical Analytical System

General equilibrium theory as a theoretical tool of describing economic phenomenon and generalizing economic problem has characters of strictness of thought system and grace of logical form.But with settled market as the theoretical premise,the equilibrium theory can be proved objectively negative by experimental observation and logical criticism.However,the part of the theory concerning inference process of settled market caused by equilibrium price has a theoretical and methodological meaning.General equilibrium theory is considered as a starting point in building axiomatic logical system and it is used to powerfully analyze and explain real economic problems with introduction of additional term of institution frame.The theory in Disequilibrium of Walras attempts to keep consistency of original logical analytical system by introducing quota regulating mechanism to build a logical analytical model that can describe dynamic equilibrium of unsettled market and is regarded as the foundation in studying economic problems.