宪政的“名”“实”之辩

针对近期学术界关于“宪政”概念内涵争论日趋白热化的沉重氛围，应当将目前关于“宪政”概念的争议区分为“名相之争”与“实相之争”。“名相之争”涉及到“宪政”概念是有独立内涵的独立词还是仅仅作为汉语长句的缩写；“实相之争”在于如何赋予“宪政”概念相应的价值内涵。由于“宪政”概念在近百年的演变史中已脱离了原先的概念“名相”，成了目前学术界使用过度泛化的概念，无法产生概念上的基本共识；由于“名相之乱”导致了“实相之乱”，“宪政”价值从法律事实到“梦想状态”，已经成为人云亦云的麻烦概念。为不因“宪政”概念上的无谓之争影响了当下的宪法实践，可以在学术上暂时“去宪政”，围绕着“依宪治国”的价值理念，扎扎实实采取一些维护宪法权威、加强宪法实施的制度举措，以此来全面推进依法治国基本方略的贯彻落实。

On the Debate between the Name and Truth of Constitutionalism

Recently the debate on the concept connotation of constitutionalism has been increasing in the academic circles.Actually,the focus of the debate should be on distinguishing the name and truth of it.The concept of constitutionalism has been over generalized in nearly a hundred years,thus has deviated from its original meaning and has caused misunderstanding.In order not to disturb the present constitutional practice,the concept of constitutionalism may be put aside in the academic circles.Based on the value concept of rule by constitution,measurements should be adopted to strengthen the constitution and promote rule by law.