首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

关于客观、全面、辩证地认识“批俞评红”的一些问题——兼答刘绪源先生
引用本文:张兴德.关于客观、全面、辩证地认识“批俞评红”的一些问题——兼答刘绪源先生[J].辽东学院学报(社会科学版),2015(1).
作者姓名:张兴德
作者单位:中共大连市中山区委宣传部,辽宁大连,116017
摘    要:不能简单地认为60年前的"批俞评红"仅仅是一场"以一位老知识分子为批判目标的全国性的运动",应该站在历史唯物主义的立场,客观、全面、辩证地认识其内容、目的、性质,不能全盘否定其必要性和正确性。客观地认识其中的缺点和负面问题,但不能把它同"文革"等同起来,认为是"极左"的产物。应历史地、客观地评价当年的"两个小人物"发表文章的前后情况,科学地认识其文章的合理的学术"内核"。

关 键 词:“批俞评红”  历史唯物主义  李希凡

Some Issues on Criticizing Yu Pingbo and Commenting on A Dream of Red Mansions:also an Answer to Mr.Liu Xuyuan
ZHANG Xing-de.Some Issues on Criticizing Yu Pingbo and Commenting on A Dream of Red Mansions:also an Answer to Mr.Liu Xuyuan[J].Journal of Liaodong University :Social Sciences,2015(1).
Authors:ZHANG Xing-de
Abstract:The activity of criticizing Yu Pingbo and commenting on A Dream of Red Mansions 60 years before can not be thought simply as a movement with an old intellectual as the criticizing target. We should impersonally,comprehensively and dialectically understand the content and nature of the movement in a historical materialism standpoint and can not totally repudiate its necessity and validity. Objectively,there are defects and negative things,but it can not be equal to the Cultural Revolution and be regarded as a ultra- left product. We should deeply study the situation when the two nobodies published their papers and scientifically recognize the reasonable academic content of the papers.
Keywords:criticizing Yu Pingbo and commenting on A Dream of Red Mansions  historitical materialism  Li Xifan
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号