首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国的马克思主义研究向何处去?
引用本文:徐长福. 中国的马克思主义研究向何处去?[J]. 求是学刊, 2003, 30(4): 13-16
作者姓名:徐长福
作者单位:中山大学,马克思主义哲学与中国现代化研究所暨哲学系,广东,广州,510275
摘    要:作为一种具有学术性的意识形态 ,在中国的马克思主义 (包括其哲学 )研究目前正面临一种危机———一方面 ,其服务于政治实践的成效在下降 ,另一方面 ,其学术水准已明显逊于一些主要的邻近学科。“向何处去”的问题就此显现出来。要克服危机 ,这种研究就必须走向意识形态取向和学术取向的相对分离———前者完全以改革开放和社会发展的政治需要为转移 ,后者则一心求解这个领域中长期积淀的学理问题 ,二者间可形成一种互补结构。其中 ,学术取向的研究应走向与其他学术领域的深度关联 ,走向与国际论坛的积极互动 ,走向观点独立的反思性探讨 ,走向学理资源的创造性转化。

关 键 词:马克思主义  意识形态  学术  取向
文章编号:1000-7504(2003)04-0013-04
修稿时间:2003-01-07

On Orientation in China''''s Marxism Research
XU Chang-fu. On Orientation in China''''s Marxism Research[J]. Seeking Truth, 2003, 30(4): 13-16
Authors:XU Chang-fu
Abstract:As an academic ideology, research on Marxism (including his philosophy) in China are facing a crisis. On one hand, the effectives of its serving political practice has been decreasing and on the other hand its academic level has plainly been inferior to some of its main related disciplines. The problem of its research orientation has stood out. In overcoming the crisis, such a research must take the way of relative separation, i.e. the separation of ideological orientation and academic orientation. The first can completely take political needs of reform and opening and social development as its centre while the latter can take how to solve the long-existing problem of academic theory as its centre. These two can form a mutually complementary structure. Research on academic orientation should tend to take a way of having deep connections with other academic fields, having active interactions with international forum, having self-examining discussion with independent view and having creative conversion of academic theoretical resource.
Keywords:Marxism  ideology  systematic learning  orientation  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号