首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Public Hearings and Public Preferences: The Case of the White House Conference on Families
Authors:O'NEIL  MICHAEL J
Institution:Michael J. O'Neil is President of O'Neil Associates, a survey research firm. He was Director of the Public Opinion Research Program at Arizona State University while this paper was written. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 36th Annual AAPOR Conference, Buck Hill Falls, Pennsylvania, May 28–31, 1982. Address reprint requests c/o O'Neil Associates, 418 East Erie, Tempe, Arizona 85282.
Abstract:To provide input into Arizona's participation in the White HouseConference on Families, the Arizona Governor's Council on Children,Youth, and Families commissioned a random statewide survey toassess the relative priority given to 41 selected family-relatedneeds and preferences for institutional responses to those needs.A similar survey was administered to participants at each ofsix regional public hearings held throughout the state priorto the 1980 White House Conference on Families. A comparisonof the two surveys provides an opportunity to test the representativenessof public hearings participants with respect to the populationfrom which they were drawn. Fundamental differences in the prioritiesof these two samples cast considerable doubt on the assumptionthat public hearings are an effective means of gauging publicsentiment.
Keywords:
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号