首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

质疑“客观的超过要素”概念
引用本文:杨书文. 质疑“客观的超过要素”概念[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2002, 16(3): 50-54
作者姓名:杨书文
作者单位:北京大学法学院 北京100871
摘    要:我国著名刑法学者张明楷教授提倡的“客观的超过要素”概念 ,不仅存在自相矛盾之处 ,而且与我国刑法基本原则及现行刑法理论体系存在若干“不兼容”现象 ;此外 ,在价值趋向角度 ,该概念有客观归罪之嫌 ,不利于刑法保障人权功能充分发挥

关 键 词:客观的超过要素  犯罪结果  客观归罪
文章编号:1002-3321(2002)03-0050-05
修稿时间:2001-12-17

Some Doubts on the Concept of "Measurement of Penalty by Factual Harms"
By Yang Shu-wen. Some Doubts on the Concept of "Measurement of Penalty by Factual Harms"[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2002, 16(3): 50-54
Authors:By Yang Shu-wen
Affiliation:By Yang Shu-wen
Abstract:The concept of "verdict of guilt by external factors" put forward by Professor Zhang Mingkai, a noted scholar on criminal law in China, is self-contradictory and does not quite agree with the basic principles in China's Criminal Law, or the current theoretical framework of the penal code. Moreover, this concept is close to external attribution of guilt , therefore, it fails to embody fully the spirit of human rights protection in the criminal law .
Keywords:verdict of guilt by external factors committing crimes external attribution of guilt
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号