| 卢梭:自然主义者,还是威权主义者? |
| |
| 引用本文： | 丁永为.卢梭:自然主义者,还是威权主义者?[J].南通工学院学报(社会科学版),2007,23(3):51-55. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 丁永为 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京师范大学教育学院,北京100875 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 在教育史上,卢梭一直被认为是自然主义者。对此观点应持一种谨慎的态度。卢梭的自然主义主张是不彻底的,具有威权主义的痕迹,这个痕迹明显地表现在他的著作《爱弥儿》一书中。正是爱弥儿的导师,设定了教育的目的、场所、程序和结果,同样是爱弥儿的导师为其选择了职业和配偶。卢梭威权教育的思想根源在于其政治诉求：建立在契约基础上的政府,在执行公意时理应具有绝对的权威,公民必须予以服从。
|
| 关 键 词： | 卢梭 自然主义 威权主义 爱弥儿 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-2190（2007）03-0051-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-09-19 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年9月19日 |
Rousseau: A Naturalist, or an Authoritarian? |
| |
| DING Yong-wei.Rousseau: A Naturalist, or an Authoritarian?[J].Journal Of Nantong University(Education Sciences Edition),2007,23(3):51-55. |
| |
| Authors: | DING Yong-wei |
| |
| Abstract: | Rousseau was always regarded as a naturalist in the history of education.But in this essay,the author tries his best to argue that Rousseau was an authoritarian more than a naturalist.The evidences are from Rousseau's famous work Emile.Emile's tutor enacted the goals,location,process and the end of his education.His tutor chose vocation and wife for him as well.The root of this educational thought is his particular political pursuit. |
| |
| Keywords: | Rousseau naturalism authoritarianism Emile |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
