首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国土地征收司法治理中的证据逻辑
引用本文:余贵忠,刘 华,杨继文.中国土地征收司法治理中的证据逻辑[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2023(3):126-133.
作者姓名:余贵忠  刘 华  杨继文
作者单位:(1.贵州大学 法学院,贵州 贵阳 550025;2.华东政法大学 刑事法学院,上海 201620)
摘    要:土地征收的法学研究需要向司法治理拓展。在司法治理中的土地征收主要体现为三重维度的程序性证据逻辑:行政机关土地征收的过程理性、规则之治的调适之道和内卷化的证据治理。在证据逻辑中构建和完善的土地保护应对机制,包括构建土地保护全社会程序约束机制,强调环境行政审判队伍的专业化和职业化建设,构建涉及土地行政案件的专家辅助人证据制度,完善涉及土地行政案件的第三方鉴定证据机制,明晰红线范围事实认定的措施和证据标准。

关 键 词:土地征收  程序自治  司法功能主义

Evidence Logic in Judicial Governance of Land Expropriation in China
YU Gui-zhong,LIU Hu,YANG Ji-wen.Evidence Logic in Judicial Governance of Land Expropriation in China[J].Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences),2023(3):126-133.
Authors:YU Gui-zhong  LIU Hu  YANG Ji-wen
Abstract:The study of land expropriation needs to be extended to the functional governance in the judicial field. The evidence logic of the triple dimension on land protection in judicial trials are mainly embodied in the following aspects: the process of land expropriation in the executive branch is rational, the way of adjustment of the rule of law and the rule of evidence of involution. Finally, we need to build and improve the land protection mechanism in the theoretical construction of the interconnection of procedural logic development and due process autonomy. Firstly, we should get the construction of rural land protection and social restraint mechanism; secondly, we need the emphasis on the professional and professional construction of environmental administrative trial team; thirdly, we should make the construction of an expert assistant system in administrative cases involving soil; fourthly, we should get the improvement of identification mechanism of the third party in administrative cases involving soil; fifthly, we should improve the measures and standards for determining the scope of the red line.
Keywords:land expropriation  procedural autonomy  judicial functionalism
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号