| 菌毒敌与石炭酸消毒效力的比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王琴,沙莎,周廷宣,程方俊,田晋红,徐兴然. 菌毒敌与石炭酸消毒效力的比较研究[J]. 西南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 1998, 0(Z1) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王琴 沙莎 周廷宣 程方俊 田晋红 徐兴然 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川畜牧兽医学院动物医学系!荣昌402460 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 采用石炭酸系数测定法、挖沟法及沉降法分别对菌毒敌和石炭酸的消毒效力进行了比较研究。结果表明:菌毒敌的石炭酸系数为3.34。菌毒敌(1:200)在室内空气消毒后1h和4h消除率分别为76.75％和85.81％;石炭酸(1:200)的消除率分别为50.73％和81.52％。试验表明:菌毒敌用于畜禽环境的消毒效力较石炭酸为佳。
|
| 关 键 词： | 菌毒敌 消毒效力 测定 |
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DISINFECTANT EFFECTIVENESS OF JUN - DU - DI AND CARBOLIC ACID |
| |
| Wang Qin Sha Sha Zhou Tingxuan et al.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DISINFECTANT EFFECTIVENESS OF JUN - DU - DI AND CARBOLIC ACID[J]. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University:Social Science Edition, 1998, 0(Z1) |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Qin Sha Sha Zhou Tingxuan et al. |
| |
| Affiliation: | Wang Qin Sha Sha Zhou Tingxuan et al. |
| |
| Abstract: | A comparative study was carried out to examine disinfectant effectiveness of Jun - Du - Di and carbolic acid with phend coefficient test, ditch test and subside test. The experiments showed that the phend coeficient test of Jun - Du - Di was 3.34; Jun - Du - Di (1:200) and carbolic acid (1:' 200) were used for indoor clean - up and their disinfectant effectiveness was tested after 1 hour and 4 hours. The rsults were 76.75 % and 85.81 % , 50.73 % and 81.52 % , respectively. It proved that Jun - Du - Di was a more powerful disinfectant than carbolic acid for animal housing. |
| |
| Keywords: | Jun - Du - Di Disinfectant Effectiveness test |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
