| 同与不同的悖论及其它——《庄子·齐物论》“辩”说刍论 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘顺,安家琪.同与不同的悖论及其它——《庄子·齐物论》“辩”说刍论[J].阴山学刊,2011(4):82-86. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘顺 安家琪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学中文系;兰州大学文学院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《齐物论》的辩说在庄子的思想中是达成以辩止辩、以不齐为齐的有效手段。但庄周并未严格遵守辩说的内在逻辑，且有意忽视了“同”与“不同”在辩论中的对等地位。近代以来的《齐物论》接受史在推进理解深化的同时，以“齐物”论为解读焦点及解读话语上的诗性偏好，也暴露了中国学人轻逻辑推理重个体感悟的思维特点，“接着讲”的学术意识与当下之...
|
| 关 键 词： | 《齐物论》 辩 同与不同 异类不比 成像系统 接受史 |
Paradox of the Equality and Inequality and the Others:A Primary Discussion on the Debate of Equality of Things |
| |
| LIU Shun,AN Jia-qi.Paradox of the Equality and Inequality and the Others:A Primary Discussion on the Debate of Equality of Things[J].Yin Shan Academic Journal,2011(4):82-86. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Shun AN Jia-qi |
| |
| Institution: | LIU Shun1,AN Jia-qi2(1.Chinese Department,Fudan University,Shanghai 200433,2.Faculty of Arts,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000) |
| |
| Abstract: | The debate theory of Equality of Things was Zhuangzi's method to get across the No-debate by debate and equality by inequality.But Zhuangzi didn't follow close to the inner logic of debate and missed the equal status of equality and inequality intentionally.From late Qing Dynasty the reception history of the Equality of Things had a good job in promoting the understanding of Zhuangzi,but took the equality as the focal point and neglected the import of reasoning logic,and the academic awareness of Succession... |
| |
| Keywords: | Equality of Things Debate Equality and inequality Heterogeneous not comparison Image system Reception history |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
