| 我国《可再生能源法》的制度构建与选择 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李艳芳.我国《可再生能源法》的制度构建与选择[J].中国人民大学学报,2005(1). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李艳芳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学法学院 北京 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 配额制和固定电价制度是国际上有关可再生能源发展的两种主要制度。配额制是一种基于市场的制度,而固定电价制度则更多的是基于政府推动的制度。根据我国能源需求的宏观态势和可再生能源的发展状况,我国《可再生能源法》在构建具体的法律制度时,采用配额制会遇到巨大的障碍,至少在目前我国不具备实行配额制的条件;相反,固定电价制度由于在我国具有更强的可操作性,可以作为扶持可再生能源早期发展的主要机制。
|
| 关 键 词： | 可再生能源法 配额制 固定电价制度 |
The System Construction and Choice of "Renewable Energy Promoting Law" of China |
| |
| Li Yan-fang.The System Construction and Choice of "Renewable Energy Promoting Law" of China[J].Journal of Renmin University of China,2005(1). |
| |
| Authors: | Li Yan-fang |
| |
| Abstract: | Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) and Feed-in Tariffs are two main systems in promoting the renewable energy development abroad. Which system should be chosen in drafting out "Renewable Energy Promoting Law" of China? Through the comparison of Renewable Portfolio Standards and Feed-in Tariffs, and relating with the situation of the renewable energy development in China, the author thinks that Feed-in Tariffs is a better choice in China. |
| |
| Keywords: | Renewable Energy Law Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) Feed-in Tariffs |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
