| 审级制度与司法公正 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 冯秋燕.审级制度与司法公正[J].学术交流,2003(5):35-37. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 冯秋燕 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 哈尔滨工业大学,人文学院,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150006 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 近年来法院判决的公正性不断遭受质疑 ,进入再审程序的民事、经济案件越来越多 ,两审终审制名存实亡。为保证司法公正的实现 ,学术界提出了三审终审制的主张。无论两审终审制 ,还是三审终审制 ,解决司法腐败问题才是实现司法公正的途径。
|
| 关 键 词： | 审级制度 司法公正 司法腐败 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-8284(2003)05-0035-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年1月4日 |
Adjudication Grade System and Fairness of Judicature |
| |
| FENG Qiu,yan.Adjudication Grade System and Fairness of Judicature[J].Academic Exchange,2003(5):35-37. |
| |
| Authors: | FENG Qiu yan |
| |
| Abstract: | In recent years, the fairness of court decisions has always been questioned and ever increasing rehear civil, economic cases make the necessity of two grade final judgment in vain. Then academic circles try to put forward a three grade last instance to uphold the fairness of judicature. This paper holds that only through resisting judicial corruption can we find out the way to realize impartial judicature. |
| |
| Keywords: | adjudication grade system fairness of judicature corruption in judicature |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
