首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论“周礼在鲁”的二元界定
引用本文:毕经纬. 论“周礼在鲁”的二元界定[J]. 殷都学刊, 2011, 0(4): 18-22
作者姓名:毕经纬
作者单位:[1] [美]匹兹堡大学人类学系 [2]陕西师范大学历史文化学院,陕西西安710062
摘    要:考察《左传》,韩宣子说"周礼尽在鲁矣",是在"观书于太史氏"之后,有感于鲁国较好地保存了记载周礼的前朝典籍,而并非看到了鲁国守礼的事实。事实上,春秋时期鲁国周礼的崩坏情况比大多数国家都严重,周礼亦不在鲁。是以,"周礼在鲁"之论成立的条件应予以二元界定:一指春秋之时鲁国对记载周礼的前朝典籍的妥善保存情况,其实质是"礼书在鲁;"或指春秋之后礼学在鲁国的兴起情况,其实质是"礼学在鲁"。

关 键 词:《左传》  鲁国  违礼  礼书在鲁  礼学在鲁

The Dualistic Restrictions to the Proposition of Zhou-li Zai Lu
BI Jing-wei. The Dualistic Restrictions to the Proposition of Zhou-li Zai Lu[J]. Yindu Journal, 2011, 0(4): 18-22
Authors:BI Jing-wei
Affiliation:BI Jing-wei(Department of Anthropology,University of Pittsburgh;School of History and Culture, Shanxi Normal University,Xi'an 710062,China)
Abstract:It was after guan shu yu tai-shi that Han Xuan-zi(韩宣子) said that zhou-li jin zai lu yi(周礼尽在鲁矣,Zhou-li was totally preserved in Lu State),and he didn't see the facts of people' obeying Zhou-li in Lu State.In fact,the phenomenon of trampling Zhou-li in Lu was more serious than that in most of other states.Zhou-li was not in Lu at all.The proposition of Zhou-li zai Lu should be confined by the following dualistic restrictions.Firstly,the proposition is right only after Spring and Autumn period,that is to say,Li-xue zai lu(礼学在鲁,Li-xue was in Lu State).Secondly,the proposition is also correct if we refer to the preservation of the books recording documents about Zhou-li in the former dynasty.And its essence is Li-shu zai lu(礼书在鲁,the books on Zhou-li were in Lu State).
Keywords:Zuo-zhuan  Lu State  violate Zhou-li  Li-shu zai Lu  Li-xue zai Lu
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号