| 社会技术：康德和马克思“两种实践”的本体论旨趣 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 田鹏颖. 社会技术：康德和马克思“两种实践”的本体论旨趣[J]. 山东科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2007, 9(3): 7-12 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 田鹏颖 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 沈阳师范大学,马克思主义学院,辽宁,沈阳,110034 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 作为德国两位伟大的哲学家,康德和马克思都主张"两种实践"观,并都试图把"两种实践"统一起来.马克思在康德"两种实践"观的基础上继续创新,把"两种实践"统一于"生产实践"并赋予"生产实践"以本体论意蕴.马克思在康德"道德地实践"基础上继续创新,把调整人与人的(社会)关系作为人们改造和调整人与自然关系实践的前提,并进而赋予社会技术以本体论旨趣.
|
| 关 键 词： | 社会技术 两种实践 康德和马克思 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-7699(2007)03-0007-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-04-27 |
Social Technology: Ontological Implication of "Two Practices" by Kant and Marx |
| |
| TIAN Peng-ying. Social Technology: Ontological Implication of "Two Practices" by Kant and Marx[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Sciences & Technology(Social Science), 2007, 9(3): 7-12 |
| |
| Authors: | TIAN Peng-ying |
| |
| Abstract: | Both Kant and Marx,the two outstanding philosophers in Germany,advocate and unify the idea of "Two Practices".Based on Kant's "Two Practices",Marx innovatively unifies the "Two Practices" with "production practice",and sees the "production practice" as ontological implication.In addition,on the basis of Kant's "moral practice",he views the regulation of(social) relationship among individuals as the premise of human practice in the reform and regulation of natural relationship between man and nature,and then he entrusts the ontological implication to social technology. |
| |
| Keywords: | social technology Two Practices Kant and Marx |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
