| 再论“以美育代宗教”——兼与李丕显、赵惠霞先生商榷 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 薛富兴. 再论“以美育代宗教”——兼与李丕显、赵惠霞先生商榷[J]. 汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2004, 20(5): 12-17,33 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 薛富兴 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南开大学哲学系,天津,300071 |
| |
| 摘 要： | “以美育代宗教”论于理有诸多未通处。人类精神需求与活动之丰富性、当代社会的多元文化结构、人类的有限性决定了宗教仍有其生存之理由 ,审美与宗教各自独特的文化功能不能相互代替。“以美育代宗教”论在中国无传统与现实文化基础。人文学科内部亟需相互交流。
|
| 关 键 词： | 美育 宗教 文化功能 文化转型 形而上与形而下 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-4225(2004)05-0012-006 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-07-07 |
A Second Comment upon"Substituting Aesthetic Education for Religion" |
| |
| XUE Fu-xing. A Second Comment upon"Substituting Aesthetic Education for Religion"[J]. Journal of Shantou University(Humanities Edition), 2004, 20(5): 12-17,33 |
| |
| Authors: | XUE Fu-xing |
| |
| Abstract: | The statement of“substituting aesthetic education for religion”is unacceptable.Religion has its own right of existence.The human beings have diverse spiritual needs and colorful activities.The modern social structure is multiple and the human beings have limitations.The respective functions of aesthetics and religion cannot be replaced mutually.This statement had no traditional and realistic cultural basis in China.The different fields within the humanities are in urgent need of mutual communication. |
| |
| Keywords: | aesthetic education religion cultural function cultural transformation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
