首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

司法考试制度的悖论分析--一个制度-利益均衡论的进路
引用本文:黄永锋.司法考试制度的悖论分析--一个制度-利益均衡论的进路[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004,22(4):333-338.
作者姓名:黄永锋
作者单位:海南大学,法学院,海南,海口,570228
摘    要:从日常生活经验出发提出了制度-利益均衡论的假说,并运用该假说的分析框架对与司法考试制度相关的四个悖论--鼓励思维与压抑思维、法学的神圣化与法学的庸俗化、法律职业者的过剩与法律职业者的缺失、造就法律职业共同体与分化法律职业群体--进行分析;在揭示了其中的制度利益和制度均衡状况后,对司法考试制度的成熟性和活力作了一个初步的评价.

关 键 词:司法考试  制度  利益  均衡
文章编号:1004-1710(2004)04-0333-06
修稿时间:2004年8月11日

A Critical Analysis of the Paradoxes Pertaining to the National Judicial Examination System
HUANG Yong-feng.A Critical Analysis of the Paradoxes Pertaining to the National Judicial Examination System[J].Humanities & Social Sciences Journal of Hainan University,2004,22(4):333-338.
Authors:HUANG Yong-feng
Abstract:The paper starts with a hypothesis on equilibrium of interests within an institutional arrangement, and then conducts a critical analysis of four paradoxes pertaining to the national judicial examination system. The four paradoxes cover encouragement and inhibition of thinking, sanctification and vulgarization of law, surplus and shortage of legal professionals, establishment of professional community and polarization of professional groups. Lastly, the paper makes a preliminary evaluation of the existing examination system with regards to its maturity and vitality.
Keywords:judicial exam  system  interests  equilibrium
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号