| 合议庭中评议决策的偏好逻辑分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 贺寿南. 合议庭中评议决策的偏好逻辑分析[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2014, 0(3): 22-25,57 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 贺寿南 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 衡阳师范学院人文社科系,湖南衡阳421002 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社科项目＂司法裁判中法官理性实现的逻辑分析＂（10YJCZH039）;湘潭大学诉讼法学研究中心开放课题＂民事裁判的博弈分析＂（12fx005）的阶段性成果.. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 合议庭的评议是审判运行机制中的最核心部分,其合理运作直接决定着审判制度功能的发挥.构建一个科学、合理的评议程序是实现司法裁判结果公正、合理的有效保障.我国有关评议制度的法律规定本身并不健全,合议庭评议规则存在漏洞.合议庭可将各法官对某案件态度的偏好汇集成群体偏好,然后做出优劣排序或从中选优而形成一个总的裁判决策.
|
| 关 键 词： | 合议庭 评议决策 偏好逻辑 |
Analysis on Preference Logic of Appraisal Decision-making in Collegial Panel |
| |
| HE Shou-nan. Analysis on Preference Logic of Appraisal Decision-making in Collegial Panel[J]. Journal of Chongqing Institute of Technology, 2014, 0(3): 22-25,57 |
| |
| Authors: | HE Shou-nan |
| |
| Affiliation: | HE Shou-nan (Department of Humanities and Social Science, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421002, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The deliberation of collegiate bench is the central part of the trial operation mechanism, which will directly determine the operation of the judicial system. Constructing a scientific and reason- able evaluation program is the effective safeguard that realizes fair and reasonable judicial referee re-suits. The law on deliberation system in China itself is not sound, because there are loopholes in eval-uation rules. The collegiate bench condenses all individuals＇ preferences of judges into group prefer-ence and arranges in order or select the best scheme by comparison to form a general juridical deci-sion. |
| |
| Keywords: | collegial panel appraisal decision-making preference logic |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
