首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Rural small towns: an environmental context for aging
Institution:1. School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;2. School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia;3. Department of Mineralogy, South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;4. College of Science Technology and Engineering, Matter and Materials Group, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia;5. School of Biological Sciences, The Sprigg Geobiology Centre, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;6. CSIRO Land and Water, Waite Campus, Glen Osmond, South Australia, Australia
Abstract:Following a brief review of sociological and psychological definitions of rurality, this paper illustrates the uses of an empirically-derived taxonomy of environmental perceptions for understanding the rural experiences of older residents of small towns in the midwestern United States. Specifically, variations in perceptions of twelve dimensions of rural environments were examined (1) among older residents of small towns of different sizes (populations 100–500, 501–1500 or 1501–2500), and (2) among four groups of older residents (n = 898) displaying differing profiles of subjective social and psychological well-being. Reliable town- size differences in environmental perceptions were found for eight of the 12 environmental attributes. Illustratively, residents of smaller towns reported lower levels of community satisfaction and community involvement, higher levels of intimacy and consensus on town issues, and fewer barriers to services and activities than residents of larger towns. Reliable differences in environmental perceptions were found for ten of the attributes for older residents differing in well-being. For example, more frail residents were less satisfied with their communities, and felt more constricted and isolated by physical barriers and social norms; they were less involved in their communities and less aware of available community services. The advantages of the application of person-environment taxonomies to research and intervention in rural environments are discussed. Chief among these is the refinement gained in the understanding of individual differences in ecological adaptation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号