| 论格式条款之订入合同及其效力——与德国、台湾地区立法之比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 谭振亚,胡建. 论格式条款之订入合同及其效力——与德国、台湾地区立法之比较[J]. 河南科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 30(2): 99-103 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 谭振亚 胡建 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 重庆市第一中级人民法院,重庆,401147
2. 西南政法大学法学院,重庆,401120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金项目，教育部人文社会科学2009年度研究项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国《合同法》第39、40条分别对格式条款之订入合同及格式条款订入合同后的效力进行了规定。与德国、台湾地区的立法相比较,我国合同立法对格式条款订入合同的要件规定得不全面,同时对格式条款的效力未能确定一个效力原则,相关立法的条文之间存在诸多矛盾和冲突。在中国未来制定民法典时,建议对格式条款以专章或者专节的形式作出统一、严谨的规定。
|
| 关 键 词： | 格式条款 要件 合同效力 |
On Setting Standard Terms into Contract and Contractual Effect |
| |
| TAN Zhen-ya,HU Jian. On Setting Standard Terms into Contract and Contractual Effect[J]. Journal of Henan University of Science & Technology:Social science, 2012, 30(2): 99-103 |
| |
| Authors: | TAN Zhen-ya HU Jian |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.Chongqing No.1 Intermediate People’s Court,Chongqing 401147,China; 2.School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The concept and the effect of standard terms in the contract have been respectively stipulated in the 39th and 40th articles of China’s Contract Law.By comparison with German and Taiwanese laws,our legislations on contract are incomprehensive concerning the conditions and the criteria of standard terms in the contract and have failed to found the efficacy principle for the efficacy of standard terms.Meanwhile,there are many contradictions and conflicts among terms and provisions in related legislations.Hence it would be expected that in China’s future development in the Civil Code,an exclusive chapter or separate section could be stipulated for the standard terms in a form of integrated and accurate provisions. |
| |
| Keywords: | standard terms elements contractual effect |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
