朱熹与《尔雅》

朱熹学识宏富,遍注群经,却惟于<尔雅>一经既无专门著作,又极少论说,学者对朱熹与<尔雅>关系的研究因此也十分罕见.从总体上说,朱熹对<尔雅>持一种较为明确的怀疑和否定态度,认为其"不足据以为古".尽管朱熹对<尔雅>的基本态度是否定的,但在其著作中对<尔雅>解说进行正面驳正的例子却极少,更多的则是对<尔雅>解说的撷取.朱熹对<尔雅>的态度,首先与<尔雅>一书的词典性质有关,词典的形式使它无法像其他经书那样可以更直接地表现其义理思想,因而难以引起主要作为理学家的朱熹的更大关注;其次,朱熹对<尔雅>的怀疑态度,是宋代以来疑古辨伪思潮的必然结果,朱熹怀疑<尔雅>也是其辨伪学的重要成果.朱熹对于<尔雅>的言说应当成为朱熹经学的重要组成部分.

Master ZHU Xi and His Interpretations of Erya

Zhu Xi don't have both specialized publications and articles on "Erya" in"the Thirteen Confucian Classics",and the researches of ralation between Zhu Xi and"Erya" are also very scarce in future generations.However the "Erya" is an important Confucian classics,it is necessary to study the relationship between Zhu Xi and "Erya".Now this paper will elaborate on the relationship between Zhu Xi and "Erya" from the three aspects of overall assessment of Zhu Xi's,refutation and retrieval of Zhu Xi's,and Zhu Xi distinguished false of "Erya" and the thought of "suspecting the ancient to distinguish truth and false" in Song Dynasty and so on.