鲁迅等定谳的金圣叹"腰斩"《水浒》一案不能翻——兼批周岭袭据罗尔纲抄自周繥的误说之谬

金圣叹"腰斩"<水浒>一说,经鲁迅等学者的考证已为学界认同.然而,周岭于1998年在<文学评论>上发表长文对此定论提出了"质疑".该文经多家文摘报刊转载之后,在学界产生了较大的负面影响.本文认为,对某一问题哪怕是已形成了定论的问题提出"质疑",本是正常的无可厚非的学术自由.问题是,周岭一文不仅考据欠妥,而且多有抄袭他人之嫌,却居然在刊物上公开发表,这不能不说是一个严重的学风问题.本文对周岭一文的误谬之处进行了逐条批驳,对此文涉及的学风问题进行了严正批评,希望能够以正视听.

LU Xun's Verdict about JIN Sheng-tan's Cutting the Water Margin in Half Should Not Be Reversed

LU Xun's theory about JIN Sheng-tan's cutting the Water Margin in half has been acknowledged in academic circles. But a paper written by ZHOU Ling, which called the theory in question, was published in Literature Review in 1998 and was then widely reprinted in journals and newspapers, thus maing a strong impact. The author of this article agrees that even if a final academic conclusion is reached, it is still open to question. But in ZHOU Ling's paper, much of the evidence is not irrefutable, and there are even indications of plagiarism. That it has been published in authoritative journals is a serious problem of academic discipline. By refuting ZHOU Ling's errors and criticizing the academic discipline involved, this article attempts to ensure a correct understanding of the facts.