王船山《论语》诠释中的理气观

船山对理气的说法不少同于朱子 ,但船山不像朱子那样往往用实体化的理解或说法处理有关理的问题 ,在这一点上 ,船山与元明时代理学关于“理”的理解的“去实体化”发展是一致的。而船山理气观与朱子学的不同处 ,更多地在于船山运用其理气不离的观点对许多具体问题的讨论 ,在这些讨论中可明显看到 ,凡朱子学表现出重理轻气的地方船山必强调气 ,凡朱子学言气离理的地方船山则注重理 ,凡朱子学的说法中容易把理气变成各自独立的二物之处 ,船山必定强调理气合一。故船山理气观的要点应归结为理气互体 ,理气合一

Wamg chuanshan''''s Idea of Li and Qi in His Annotation of the Analects of Confucius

Although Wang Chuanshan's understanding of Li and Qi is much the same to that of Zhu Zi,there are many differences between them:Chuanshan emphasizes Qi whenever Zhu Zi emphasizes Li,emphasizes Li whenever Zhu Zi emphasizes Qi,emphasizes the integration of Qi and Li whenever Zhu Zi emphasizes the independence of the two Therefore,it come down that the gist of chuanshan's idea of Qi and Li is that the two